Legal Opinion
Schnibbe v. Glenz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
This case has been here before (245 N. Y. 388). It came up on the pleadings. The Special Term had granted the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, and this ruling had been affirmed by the Appellate Division. We decided that there was an issue of fact presented by the answer, and reversed the judgment.
The case coming on for trial, the Special Term, after hearing both sides, granted judgment for the defendant, maldng full and complete findings of fact and conclusions of law. On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed the judgment upon the law and the facts and granted a new trial.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caldwell v. . NicolsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Schnibbe v. GlenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Goodman v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Partola Manufacturing Co. v. General Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Raphael v. KutsukianNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gang v. GangNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Madison County Trust & Deposit Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Vandershoot v. KocherNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Bell v. GitlitzNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- American Harley Corp. v. Irvin Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969