Legal Opinion
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1984No. 82 Civ. 1538(MEL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 to amend his complaint to add additional claims and defendants. The existing and proposed defendants oppose the motion on the grounds that the addition of new claims and parties would cause them undue delay and prejudice. After careful consideration of the oral and written arguments, the motion is granted in part as to the addition of the proposed defendants and claims numbered one through twenty three, and denied in part as to the twenty fourth claim.
This case has already been the subject of much motion and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Andujar v. RogowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- BAY HARBOUR MANAGEMENT, LLC v. CarothersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Virgo v. Local Union 580District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.