Legal Opinion
Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1986No. 84 Civ. 7149(RJW)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Three former sales representatives of Pendleton Woolen Mills (“Pendleton”) have filed an action against the company charging that the manner of and motivation behind their termination violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2, and unspecified state contract or common law rights. Pendleton moves under Rule 12(c), Fed.R. Civ.P., for judgment on the pleadings as to three of the four causes of action alleged in the complaint. Plaintiff cross-moves under Rule 15(a),…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Riverwoods Chappaqua Corp. And Harvey Shapiro v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Geiss v. Weinstein Company Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Lennon v. SeamanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.