Mason v. Purdy
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, 0. J.
It is conceded by the appellants that the judgment rendered by the superior court in this cause must be affirmed if' the funds arising from the annual tax levy made by the board of county commissioners in any given year can be applied to the *592payment of obligations other than those incurred during the fiscal year following such levy; but they contend that they cannot be so applied.
The provisions of the constitution upon which they rely to establish this contention are contained in §§ 5 and 8 of art. 7; and the provisions of the statute which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Cloud v. Town of SumasWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Shaw v. StatlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Schwartz v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anderson v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Barton v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Eidemiller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Lorence v. BeanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- ATU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF STATE v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.