Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Wilson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1888No. 11399PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, Wilson, as auditor of the county of San Luis Obispo, to draw his warrant on the county treasurer in favor of Schwartz and Beebee for $195.30.

A demurrer was sustained to the petition in the superior court, and appellants electing to stand upon such petition without amending, judgment dismissing the application was entered, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

It appears from the verified petition filed .on application for the writ, that Schwartz & Beebee, as copartners, on the 20th of March, 1884, sold and delivered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McGowan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Smith v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API