Legal Opinion
Centerbank v. Connell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 17, 1992No. 10844PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of the motion to reopen the judgment of foreclosure by sale filed by the defendant property owners, Thomas and Nancy Connell. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly balanced the equities of this case when it denied their “motion to reopen judgment and set a new sale date.”
The plaintiff, Centerbank, instituted this foreclosure action against the defendants, Thomas R. Connell and Nancy Flynn Connell, seeking to foreclose the mortgage it holds on the defendants’ property in Essex. On January 23, 1991, the plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Reynolds v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- New Haven Savings Bank v. GurlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. FrimbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Society for Savings v. StramagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- U.S. Bank National Assn., Trustee v. WorksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015