New Haven Savings Bank v. Gurland
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
In this action for foreclosure of a mortgage, the named defendant has appealed from the trial court’s denial of his third motion to “reopen judgment and extend law day.” “A motion to open a judgment of strict foreclosure is addressed to the discretion of the trial court; see General Statutes § 49-15; and ‘ “unless that discretion was abused or was based upon *509some error in law, the denial of the motion must stand.” Carrington v. Muhlfeld, 122 Conn. 334, 337, 189 A.2d 184 [1937].’ Sebastiano v. Corde, 171 Conn. 324, 325-26, 370 A.2d 946 (1976).” Melillo v. Spiro, 187 Conn. 333, 334, 445 A.2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carrington v. MuhlfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Melillo v. SpiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sebastiano v. CordeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. PetersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. FrimbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Centerbank v. ConnellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Broad Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- First Union National Bank v. BonitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998