Legal Opinion

Society for Savings v. Stramaglia

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 23, 1993No. 14393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The issue in this appeal is whether, in the circumstances of this case, the Appellate Court correctly concluded that the trial court had not abused its discretion by refusing to open a judgment of strict *107foreclosure despite the negotiation of a settlement agreement between the foreclosing creditor and the debtors. The plaintiff, Society for Savings, brought an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate owned jointly by the defendants Carmine S. Stramaglia and Patricia R. Stramaglia. The trial court, Pickett, J., rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure. After various sets of law days had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Fidelity Trust Co. v. IrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Manchester State Bank v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. BurgosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Haven v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Brann v. SavidesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. First Constitution Bank v. Flanders, No. Cv 910310164s (Mar. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API