Legal Opinion

Workers Compensation Fund v. Silicone Distributing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1991No. 65,312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This first impression workers compensation case examines the interrelationship of K.S.A. 44-532a and K.S.A. 44-503. The examination requires discussion and resolution of questions relating to the liability of the Workers Compensation Fund (the Fund).

The Fund appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Workers Compensation Director’s review awarding workers compensation benefits to the claimant, Chong Sun Nedzia. The district court held that the Fund is liable for the claimant’s award under K.S.A. 44-532a. We affirm.

Our jurisdiction arises…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Coble v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Citizens State Bank of Grainfield v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  4. Reeves v. Equipment Service Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Williams v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. Duarte v. DeBruce Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Helms v. PendergastCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API