Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 28, 2021No. 122078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 122,078 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS VICKI SCHMIDT, Kansas Insurance Commissioner, Appellee/Cross-appellant, v. TRADEMARK, INC., Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. DOROTEO BALLIN and BALLIN COMPANY, LLC, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Workers Compensation Act, K.S.A. 44-501 et seq., is to be liberally construed to bring employers and employees within the provisions of the law, and the Act's provision should be applied impartially to both employers and employees in cases arising under it. The goal is inclusion of employers and employees, not their exclusion. 2. A…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robinett v. the Haskell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. In re Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. Crescent Ring Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  5. Coble v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. Johnson v. CreasonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  3. LM Insurance Corporation v. Smart Framing Construction LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API