Legal Opinion

Citizens State Bank of Grainfield v. Kaiser

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 25, 1988No. 60,507PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

Anna Kaiser appeals from the district court’s ruling that her disclaimer of interest in joint tenancy accounts does not relate back to the date of her sister’s death and defeat the interest that her -judgment creditor, Citizens State Bank of Grainfield (Citizens State Bank), had acquired through garnishment.

On February 6, 1986, Citizens State Bank filed a petition seeking judgment against Anna and Carl Kaiser for the unpaid balance on a promissory note and foreclosure of a mortgage on the Kaisers’ homestead. The Kaisers did not answer, and on May 13, 1986, the court entered judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Board of Educ. of USD 512 v. Vic Regnier BuildersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. In Re Petition of City of MoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Caplinger v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. BottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Finstad v. Washburn UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Tucking v. BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY COMM'RS.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  4. Read v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Steele v. Guardianship & Conservatorship of CristSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API