Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,078 VICKI SCHMIDT, Kansas Insurance Commissioner, Appellee/Cross-appellant, v. TRADEMARK, INC., Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. DOROTEO BALLIN and BALLIN COMPANY, LLC, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When a statute is plain and unambiguous, the court must give effect to the legislative intention as expressed in the statutory language. But if a statute's language is ambiguous, we will consult our canons of construction to resolve the ambiguity. 2. Even statutory language that appears clear may be ambiguous when considered in the context of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Redd v. Kansas Truck CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Robinett v. the Haskell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Rinehart v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Coble v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Wichita v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- Monarch Build v. DLH HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
- Chesapeake Operating, LLC v. State of Wyoming, Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Sutherland v. Sutherland TrustCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
- Citizens Bank v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.