Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 24, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable L. Candy Ruff State Representative 40th District 321 Arch Leavenworth, Kansas 66048

Dear Representative Ruff:

You request our opinion on (1) whether K.S.A. 73-1211 precludes the Kansas Commission on Veterans Affairs (KCVA) itself from prosecuting claims on behalf of veterans before the federal Veterans' Administration, and (2) whether K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 73-1234, as amended by L. 2007, Ch. 151, § 1, requires the KCVA to prosecute all veterans claims only through other veterans service organizations that are participating in the service grant program administered by the KCVA.

• Kansas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Oshman Sporting Goods Co. KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. McCarthy v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. National Council on Compensation Insurance v. ToddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Workers Compensation Fund v. Silicone Distributing, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API