Legal Opinion

Davies v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 1952No. Appeal, No. 46PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

This appeal is from an order of the lower court dismissing plaintiffs’ motion to remove a nonsuit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, as we must where a nonsuit has been entered: Szukics v. Ruch, 367 Pa. 646, 81 A. 2d 903; Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. J. Jacob Shannon & Co., 363 Pa. 438, 70 A. 2d 321; the pertinent facts are as follows:

The decedent, aged 11, his sister Jane, and two other young children started to walk from the Davies home in Moscow, Pa., to Hollister, Pa., a town to the east. In order to reach their destination they walked…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kolich v. Monongahela Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Peden v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Petrowski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Conn v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Heller v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. McDonald v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Rush v. Plains TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API