Legal Opinion

Heller v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1982No. Civ. A. 79-4334PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DITTER, District Judge.

This action comes before the court on the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Thomas Heller, a student at Villanova University, brought this action against defendants Conrail, National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), and Villanova University alleging that he was injured due to defendants’ negligence when he climbed atop a boxcar which was temporarily stopped on tracks which cross the Villanova campus. As he reached the top of the boxcar, plaintiff came in contact with an overhead electrical wire which resulted in serious injuries to him.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Tonik v. Apex Garages, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Dale S. Bogus v. American Speech & Hearing AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Estate of Zimmerman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API