Legal Opinion

Schofield v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1957No. Appeal, 154PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Plaintiff appealed from an Order or Judgment of nonsuit. Isaac H. Schofield died as the result of injuries resulting from an apparent collision between a Ford station wagon which he was driving and a truck (consisting of a cab and a metal body) owned by defendant King, which was driven by defendant Gourley. The facts in this case are undisputed. Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, together with every reasonable inference therefrom (Lewis v. Quinn, 376 Pa. 109, 101 A. 2d 382; Rush v. Plains Township, 371 Pa. 117, 89 A. 2d 200; Davies v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Ebersole v. BeistlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Cuthbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API