Rush v. Plains Township
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
Was a nonsuit — viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Davies v. D. L. & W. *119R. R. Co., 370 Pa. 180, 87 A. 2d 183, properly entered in this case?
Sterling Kush, aged 7, by Francis Kush, his guardian, and Francis Kush in his own right, brought an action in trespass against the Township of Plains to recover damages for burns and other injuries sustained by Sterling on a refuse and garbage dump leased and maintained by the Township. The dump covered about a quarter of a city block and had originally been a strip mining hole. The township as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Thompson v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Altenbach, Et Ux. v. Leh. Val. R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Bruce ex rel. Bruce v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Davies v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Dugan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Christians Ex Rel. Davis v. Homestake Enterprises, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Wiegand by Wiegand v. Mars Nat. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- McFall Ex Rel. McFall v. ShelleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.