Legal Opinion

Peden v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1936No. Appeals, 242 and 243PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Mr. Justice Stern,

In this case there is no dispute between the parties as to the applicable principles of law; the sole question is whether, in view of those principles, there was evidence upon which defendant’s liability could be predicated.

At Gratztown, Westmoreland County, three brothers, Tommy Peden, aged 11 years, John Peden nine, and Albert eight, attended a school situated on a tract of ground abutting on railroad tracks upon which defendant operated its trains. The tracks were three in number, the southerly or eastbound, the middle or westbound, and a spur track to the north…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petrowski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Cover v. Hershey Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Trevethan v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. McMillan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Wilson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Gaul v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API