Dingley v. McDonald
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
PRINGLE, C.
This action is brought against stockholders of the Pacific Bank to recover the portions of the debts of the bank for which they are respectively liable as stockholders. Many claims are consolidated. But only in the case of two claims are questions presented on this appeal.
I. The complaint alleges that on the twenty-third day of June, 1893, there was on deposit in said bank belonging to and to the credit of H. D. Eowe, the assignor of the plaintiff, the sum of $4,891.01; that on said twenty-third day of June the bank closed its doors and suspended business. The answer denies that on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Cornell v. MoultonNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Misch v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Steinhart v. National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Long v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth Investment Co. v. National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Shalabi v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Rohrbach v. HammillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.