Ampex Credit Corporation and Ampex Corporation v. Needham Bateman and Harold Suit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Dr. Needham B. Bateman appeals from a jury verdict finding him liable on a guaranty agreement. Bateman admits he signed the agreement, but denies liability. He asserts that the failure of two co-guarantors to sign violated a condition precedent which his attorney had no authority to waive in his behalf, and that the lack of his consent to assignment of rights under the agreement prevents the assignee from enforcing the guaranty. Rejecting his contentions, we affirm the judgment of the district court entered on the jury verdict.
Certain equipment was transferred to three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Kidd v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Cofer v. WOFFORD OIL CO. OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Hurst v. Stith Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Paul E. Montplaisir v. Richard J. LeightonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Morris M. Glazer v. J. C. Bradford and Company, a Partnership, J. C. Bradford and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- New Holland, Inc. v. TrunkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Scroggins v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy (In Re Kaleidoscope, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.