Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Stith Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1974No. 49782PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Judge.

Appellants Genora Hurst and her son, Lawrence Hurst, entered into a guaranty agreement in favor of Credit Alliance Corporation and its "parent, subsidiary or assignee,” to be liable for the obligations of Gate City Erectors, Inc. The appellants each owned one-third of the stock of Gate City. Credit obtained the guaranty as part of an arrangement wherein Credit furnished financing to Gate City on a continuous basis to enable Gate City to buy and lease truck cranes.

The "Guaranty” provides, in pertinent part: "To induce you [Credit] to enter into one or more security agreements,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rider v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Escambia Chemical Corp. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Mabry v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Young v. John Deere Plow CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Ampex Credit Corporation and Ampex Corporation v. Needham Bateman and Harold SuitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Hazel v. Tharpe & Brooks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. FinanceAmerica Private Brands, Inc. v. Harvey E. Hall, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. WindhamDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API