Legal Opinion
Berger v. Hi-Gear Tire & Auto Supply, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 2, 1970No. [No. 323, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We are here involved with the propriety of the action of a trial judge (Pugh, J.), sitting in equity, in setting aside a deed of trust as a fraud on creditors. We shall affirm the action of the chancellor.
Bernard and Bernice Berger entered the automobile accessory business in the summer of 1965. They did so under a franchise from appellee, Hi-Gear Tire and Auto Supply, Inc. (Hi-Gear). Credit was extended by Hi-Gear. A financial statement was submitted to Hi-Gear signed by Bernard Berger prior to this extension of credit. The business did not prosper. Two stores were opened, one in Montgomery…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Kline v. Inland Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Drury v. State Capital Bank of Eastern Shore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- McCauley v. ShockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Merchants Bank v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Haley v. CorcoranDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Damazo v. WahbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Colandrea v. Colandrea (In Re Colandrea)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Stratton v. Equitable Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.