Legal Opinion
Kline v. Inland Rubber Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 9, 1949No. [No. 44, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.
In 1945 Lewis Yankelevitz and S. Martin Kornblatt formed a partnership under the name United Distributors and engaged in an automobile accessory business in Cumberland. From January, 1948 till August, 1948 they bought from plaintiff, Inland Rubber Corporation, of Chicago, tires and other accessories at an aggregate cost of about $30,000. On August 12, 1948 there was due by United to plaintiff $9,937.85. On September 4, 1948 plaintiff brought suit, and on October 20, 1948 obtained judgment by default for $9,937.85 with interest and costs.
On January 26, 1948 Yankelevitz sent Dun and Bradstreet…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dyson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Nelson v. Hagerstown BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
- Cockey v. Milne's lesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hansen v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- LeBrun v. ProsiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Berger v. Hi-Gear Tire & Auto Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Pagenhardt v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Mohar v. McLelland Lumber CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.