Legal Opinion

Merchants Bank v. Page

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 26, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bond, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Oburt.

This is a proceeding to set aside a mortgage as in fraud of the creditors of the mortgagor, under the Fraudulent Conveyance Aeifc. Acts 1920, eh. 395. All the citations of statutory provisions in this opinion refer to that act. The quesr tion to he decided is whether a mortgage, given by a wife on all her assets., to repay money fraudulently obtained by her husband, thus forestalling criminal prosecution of the husband, may be avoided at the suit of .a creditor of the wife herself.

Hnder .an order of the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, passed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BullittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  2. Wildey v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  3. Kuhn v. StansfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  4. Grover & Baker Sewing Machine Co. v. RadcliffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  5. Riley v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. Burnazos, Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. BurnazosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Hansen v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Berger v. Hi-Gear Tire & Auto Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Kline v. Inland Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Davis v. Hudson Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API