Legal Opinion
Seidle v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-3306PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action, claiming that her termination by the defendant following her four-day absence from work violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., because her absence had been occasioned by the need to care for her ill, four-year old son, Terrance Johnson (“Terrance”). Plaintiff seeks back pay from the date of her discharge, reinstatement or front pay, and other remedies available under the FMLA. Presently before the court are the parties cross-motions for summary judgment on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Equimark Commercial Finance Company v. C.I.T. Financial Services Corporation (Formerly Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Katherine L. Price v. City of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gudenkauf v. Stauffer Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Beal v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
- Boyce v. New York City Mission SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Olsen v. Ohio Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.