Legal Opinion
Equimark Commercial Finance Company v. C.I.T. Financial Services Corporation (Formerly Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 2, 1987No. 86-3478PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
In this action Equimark Commercial Finance Company (Equimark) seeks to recover a portion of a security account held by C.I.T. Financial Services Corporation (C.I.T.) established under a contract between C.I.T. and Equimark’s assignor, United Dealers Corporation (United). The district court gave summary judgment for C.I.T., holding that there was no genuine issue of fact that C.I.T. was entitled to retain the amounts in the account because of various contractual defaults by United, and that C.I.T. did not waive this right. Our review of the grant of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Maria C. Maldonado v. Orlando RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Alfred F. Harter v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Childers v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Country Floors, Inc. v. A Partnership Composed of Charley Gepner and Gary Ford, D/B/A Country TilesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Bello v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.