Legal Opinion
Olsen v. Ohio Edison Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 1997No. 1:95-cv-01928PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jay Olsen brings this action against defendant Ohio Edison Company (“Ohio Edison”). Olsen alleges that Ohio Edison violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 2611 et seq. (“FMLA”), when it suspended and terminated his employment. Olsen has moved for partial summary judgment as to Ohio Edison’s liability pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ohio Edison, also pursuant to Rule 56(c), has moved for summary judgment with respect to 01- sen’s complaint. For the reasons that follow, Ohio Edison’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Barton Willoughby, D/B/A Willoughby FarmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Fulson v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sims v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Bradley v. Mary Rutan Hospital Assoc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Hayduk v. City of JohnstownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Schaar v. Lehigh Valley Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- DeLong v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.