Legal Opinion
Rappaport v. Gelfand
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 2011No. B213618PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Defendants and appellants Marvin Gelfand (Gelfand), Steven Glaser (Glaser), Gelfand Rappaport & Glaser LLP (GRG) and *1217Gelfand & Glaser LLP (GG), the successor to GRG, appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Jerry Rappaport (Rappaport) following a bench trial to determine the “buyout price” of a dissociating partner’s interest in a law firm pursuant to Corporations Code section 16701, subd. (b).1 That section is part of the Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 (UPA) (§ 16100 et seq.), which applies to law partnerships.
In this apparent case of first impression in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Scott v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Summers v. Colette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Burton v. SannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Brennan v. Brennan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.