Legal Opinion

Burton v. Sanner

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2012No. D057579PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

This negligence action, for personal injury and wrongful death, arises from shootings by Gary Sanner during an intrusion at his home. The principal question on appeal is whether the trial court prejudicially abused its discretion by admitting the opinions of plaintiffs’ designated expert, a retired police officer, on the reasonableness of Sanner’s conduct. We answer the question in the affirmative and reverse the judgment. The test of reasonableness is an objective one for the jury when, as here, it is just as competent as the expert to evaluate the evidence and draw…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. HumphreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Brown v. RansweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CubesmartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Laloli v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. Metros v. Chowdhary CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Pappas v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  5. People v. RoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API