Chanda v. Federal Home Loans Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, Acting P. J.
Private lenders sued a private mortgage broker for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty after it was discovered that a loan they had financed had been obtained through fraud and forgery. In this case, the trial court excluded evidence of title insurance procured by the private mortgage broker as part of the lending transaction to protect the lenders from fraud and forgery as barred by the collateral source rule and refused to instruct the jury on superseding cause. We conclude the trial court prejudicially abused its discretion in excluding this evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. SchmiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ash v. North American Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re Special Task ForceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Arceo v. City of RosevilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Ash v. North American Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Crouch v. Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.