People v. Lehmann
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Appellant was found guilty of the seduction of Rosa Hunzeker under promise of marriage, and was sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. He now appeals from said judgment, and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Appellant contends, that, at the time of the commission of the alleged offense, he and Rosa were husband and wife; and whether such relation existed is the sole question made upon this appeal.
The defendant, a man forty-three years of age, lived near Lemoore, in Tulare county. In August, 1893, he *632visited a marriage bureau in San Francisco, where he was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Kilburn v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. BeeversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Freiburghaus v. FreiburghausIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Freiburghaus v. FreiburghausIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re Estate of James, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.