Legal Opinion

Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1972No. 10950PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

This appeal is taken from an order entered by the Industrial Accident Board of the State of Idaho denying the appellant’s claim for death benefits under Idaho’s Workmen’s Compensation Law. The sole question presented to the Board in this case was whether the appellant Patsy “Hamby” was, in fact, the wife of Lawrence Hamby at the time of his death in an industrial accident at the J. R. Simplot Company. The appellant claimed to be the decedent’s wife by common-law marriage. The Board held that the evidence failed to establish the existence of a common-law marriage…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Bunker Hill CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Thom v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Graham v. Larry Donohoe LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Matter of Estate of EliasenIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API