Legal Opinion
Smith MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Bob Jenkins
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1981No. 79-1270PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Bob Jenkins appeals from a directed verdict finding him in default on a promissory note and awarding Smith Machinery Company, Inc. $29,100.00 in principal and $3,762.79 in interest plus attorneys’ fees as provided in the note. 1 The issues on appeal are whether the district court erred in refusing to disallow all interest on the note as usurious and whether it erred in directing a verdict for Smith Machinery on the evidence and offers of proof presented.
In 1976, Jenkins, a farmer, purchased a combine from Smith Machinery, making a cash downpayment and giving a promissory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Tastyeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Robert Fred Swearngin v. Sears Roebuck & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Yazzie v. SulliventCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ferguson v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tito Pollice Violet Pollice, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Linda Mansfield, in No. 99-3856 v. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Research Corporation, Ltd. Tito Pollice Violet Pollice, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Linda Mansfield v. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Research Corporation, Ltd. In No. 99-3857 Tito Pollice Violet Pollice, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Linda Mansfield, in No. 99-4049 v. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Research Corporation, Ltd. Gladys Houck Marie Demitras Bragette Parker Mary Walsh, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Mary Tabb, in No. 99-3858 v. Capital Asset Research Corp., Ltd. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Holdings Gp Inc. Gladys Houck Marie Demitras Bragette Parker Mary Walsh, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Mary Tabb v. Capital Asset Research Corp., Ltd. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Holdings Gp Inc. In No. 99-3859 Gladys Houck Marie Demitras Bragette Parker Mary Walsh, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Mary Tabb, in No. 99-3898 v. Capital Asset Research Corp., Ltd. National Tax Funding, L.P. Capital Asset Holdings Gp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Russell Eugene Hurd v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Carl H. COCKRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.