Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Jowers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1960No. 38370PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

“1. Brokers in whose hands property is placed for sale, in order to 'earn commissions on account of the sale of such property, must either have sold it or have been the, procuring cause of the sale. Doonan v. Ives, 73 Ga. 295 (1); Graves v. Hunnicutt, 8 Ga. App. 99 (68 S. E. 558). 2. Where property placed in the hands of a broker for sale is subsequently sold by the owner, the broker is entitled to the commission if he was the procuring cause of the sale, although the sale was actually consummated by the owner. Hardin v. Stansel, 13 Ga. App. 22 (1) (78 S. E. 681); Case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Wood v. FRANK GRAHAM COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Graves v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharp-Boylston Co. v. LundeenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Thornton v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Lundin v. KunianskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Howell Realty Co. v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API