Howell Realty Co. v. Boggs
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
It is contended by defendant that the terms of the contract conclusively establish that plaintiff is not entitled to the commissions on the sales of the properties involved since plaintiff voluntarily terminated her relationship with defendant on a date prior to the time that the sales were completed. The contract, however, specifies that the commission is payable upon real estate transactions "procured” by the plaintiff when the defendant has collected the commission. The undisputed evidence shows that the efforts of the plaintiff were the efficient and the procuring cause…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Humphries & Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Roberts v. Prater & ForresterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Shaw v. ChilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Adams Loan & Investment Co. v. Dolvin Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Arnold v. JowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rucker v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Peach State Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979