Socialist Party v. Uhl.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Board of Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco, and to the Registrar of Voters of that City and County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
LORIGAN, J.—This
is an original application by the petitioners for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents— the election commissioners and the registrar of voters of the city and county of San Prancisco—to receive petitions and hold a primary election under the so-called primary law of 1901 [Stats. 1901, p. 606], as amended in 1907, [Stats. 1907, p. 650], the provisions of which are found in the Political Code embraced in sections 1357 to 1375 inclusive.
The petition contains all the necessary averments showing that the Socialist Party is a legal political entity entitled under the terms…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Breckon v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Zent v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Adair v. DrexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Montgomery v. ChelfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Johnson v. County of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Moore v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.