State v. Kalish, 2006-L-093 (7-27-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Laura Ann Kalish, appeals the sentence imposed by the Lake County Court of Common Pleas. At issue is whether appellant's sentence was inconsistent and disproportionate under Ohio's sentencing statutes and whether it violated the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On August 5, 2005, at approximately 1:00 a.m., appellant was driving her vehicle in Kirtland Hills when she entered I-90 from the I-90 westbound exit ramp at Center Street. She was heading eastbound on westbound I-90. As she entered the exit…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SpellmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Underwood, 2008-L-113 (5-1-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Delmanzo, 2007-L-218 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Holloman, 07ap-875 (6-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Demarco, 2007-L-130 (7-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.