Legal Opinion

State v. Holloman, 07ap-875 (6-3-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2008No. 07AP-875PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Martin L. Holloman, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to correct a void sentence. For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment.

{¶ 2} An indictment filed April 25, 2005 charged appellant with one count of aggravated burglary in violation of R.C. 2911.11. The indictment alleged that appellant illegally entered an apartment and inflicted, attempted or threatened to inflict physical harm to the occupant of the apartment. A jury found appellant guilty as charged in the indictment. The trial court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. HitesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Hayes, 08ap-233 (3-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. TerrelOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API