Hargus v. Select Foods, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The defendants have entered successive appeals from the Hearing Commissioner, from the Full Commission, and from the Superior Court. At all times they have contended the claimant has not shown competent evidence of injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment or a causal relationship between the injury complained of and the need for the operation. These are critical matters involved in the proceedings. The stipulations appear to be sufficient to dispose of other matters.
Stipulations are in the nature of judicial admissions. Unless limited as to time or application,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Mayo v. City of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Matter of Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Hargus v. Select Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967