Legal Opinion
Matter of Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 28, 1978No. 7PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
249 S.E.2d 698 (1978)
295 N.C. 1
In the Matter of the ORDINANCE OF ANNEXATION NO. 1977-4.
No. 7.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 28, 1978.
Bernard A. Harrell, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellant.
Smith, Everett & Womble by W. Harrell Everett, Jr., Goldsboro, for respondent-appellee.
BRITT, Justice.
Under G.S. 160A-50(f), the person challenging an annexation ordinance must show (1) that the statutory procedure was not followed, or (2) that the provisions of G.S. 160A-47 were not met, or (3) that the provisions of G.S. 160A-48 have not been met. The party challenging the annexation has the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- City of Wichita Falls v. Bowen, TrusteeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981