Legal Opinion
Vogt Ex Rel. Vogt v. Borough of Belmar
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 11, 1954PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
On May 22, 1950, appellant suffered personal
injury under circumstances that concededly would entitle him to compensation under the State Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1911, as amended, R. S. 34:15-7 et seq., if at the time of the mishap he bore to the defendant. Borough of Belmar the relationship contemplated by section 43 of the act, as amended by c. 430 of the Session Laws of 1948, N. J. S. A. 34:15-43, providing, inter alia, that with certain exceptions not here pertinent, “each and every active volunteer fireman doing public fire duty and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zabriskie v. Cleveland, Columbus, & Cincinnati RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hackett v. OttawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- BISSELL v. City of JeffersonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Devney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- O'MALLEY v. Department of EnergySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- City of East Orange v. TP. OF LIVINGSTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Casamasino v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Middletown Township Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n Local No. 124 v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.