Zygmunt John Samiec v. Susan Kay Hopkins, F/K/A Susan K. Samiec

HILL, Justice.

[11] In this post-divorce dispute, Zyg-munt Samiec (Father) appeals a district court order requiring him to pay 75% of his daughter's residential treatment costs. Father contends that the district court erred in failing to recognize either a written or an implied agreement between Father and his former wife, Susan Hopkins f/k/a Samiee (Mother), to split the residential treatment costs equally. Alternatively, Father argues that the district court should have applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel to find a binding agreement between Mother and Father to share equally in the…