Acton v. Acton

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Kimberly A. Acton (Wife), argues that the district court erred when it required her to return certain personal property to Appellee, Kurt A. Acton (Husband). By allowing Husband to recover property after the divorce decree’s 90-day deadline, Wife argues that the district court improperly modified a property settlement without the required written agreement. We will affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Did the district court have authority to modify the parties’ Decree of Divorce?

FACTS

[¶3] Husband and Wife divorced in October of 2014. Their divorce decree incorporated a settlement.…