Legal Opinion

Smith v. K & F INDUSTRIES, INC.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 20, 2002No. 00 CIV. 5422(VM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in the matter of Mary Wade Smith v. K & F Industries, Inc. and Loral Space and Communications, Ltd., docket number 00 civ. 5422. Defendant K & F Industries, which the Court will refer to as “K & F”, and Defendant Loral Space and Communications, Ltd., herein referred to as “Loral”, each filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against all claims. The Court rules on those motions below.

On July 21, 2000, Mary Wade Smith, whom I will call “Smith”, filed a complaint alleging that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring, and David WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Istar Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Ellis v. Century 21 Department StoresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Briggs v. Women in Need, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  4. Krause v. Lancer & Loader Group, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Bricklayers & Allied Craft-Workers Local 2 v. C.G. Yantch, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API