Legal Opinion
Briggs v. Women in Need, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 24, 2011No. 10-CV-2265 (RRM)(JO)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge.
Plaintiff Alicia Briggs (“Briggs” or “plaintiff’) brings this pro se action against defendant Women in Need, Inc. (“WIN” or “defendant”) alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k) (“PDA”). Briggs alleges that she was unlawfully terminated on the basis of her pregnancy and associated medical issues. Currently before the Court is WIN’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Barrett v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Jackson v. BattagliaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Campanella v. County of MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Krause v. Lancer & Loader Group, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Peck v. Hillside Children's CenterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.