Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1989No. 88-090PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Rosie J. Rose appeals from the judgment on a $3,300 verdict in an eminent domain proceeding. See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 76-701 et seq. (Reissue 1986). Rose also appeals from the allowance of fees for the condemnees’ expert witness and attorney and from the assessment of interest in a condemnation case.

During pendency of this appeal, George R Rose died. The appeal was revived in the name of Rosie Rose, the heir of George Rose and, apparently, the personal representative of the estate of George Rose.

As background for the eminent domain proceeding, the city had installed a water main at the east…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Alliance National Bank & Trust Co. v. State Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Burns v. Veterans of Foreign WarsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Holden v. UrbanNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. MessersmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jensen v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Chadron Energy Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sikyta v. Arrow Stage Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Maresh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API