Perley v. County of Muskegon
Michigan Supreme Court
Ei'ror to Muskegon Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J:
Plaintiffs in error, wlio are surviving partners of Perley, Palmer & Co. (consisting of themselves and Charles Merrill, deceased), are sued for moneys alleged to have been received by or used for that firm, belonging to the county of Mus-kegon. The action is under the common counts for money had and received, and items were given under a bill of particulars. The funds are claimed to have been furnished or used by Martin Perley, then county treasurer, out of county moneys in his hands. The case presents many separate questions of law and evidence, the most important of which relate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- United States v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Bend v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Muzzy v. ShattuckCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Board of Fire & Water Commissioners v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Tillinghast v. . MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- State ex rel. First National Bank v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Grammel v. CarmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Hill v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.