Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Beers

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1952No. Civ. 8097PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by Thomas B. and Lela Beers, husband and wife, the defendants in intervention from a decree quieting title to the real property in question. in the County of Butte, the plaintiff in intervention.

In 1882 John Bidwell, by quitclaim deed, conveyed to the county a narrow parcel of land along the Sacramento River comprising approximately 11% acres. It is bounded by what is now Sutter Avenue on the east, the Sacramento River on the west, and Chico Creek on the south. The deed contained the following language: “Said land is to be used for the sole use of a road to the Bridge and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Papst v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Parry v. Berkeley Hall School FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Humboldt County v. Van DuzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Pico v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boughton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Wilkerson v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. City of Glendora v. FausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Taylor v. Continental Southern Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Mountain Brow Lodge No. 82 v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API