Legal Opinion

Papst v. Hamilton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1901No. S.F. No. 862PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment for plaintiff on demurrer to the complaint. The complaint alleges the ownership of certain land by the plaintiff, December 8, 1882, and the execution by him of a deed, of that date, to the defendants, and others now deceased, conveying to them, “as joint tenants, with right of survivorship as such, and not as tenants in common,” etc., the land mentioned, “upon the conditions, however, that the premises shall be used solely for the purpose of erecting, furnishing, keeping, and' maintaining thereon an academic or collegiate school for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parsons v. SmilieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Liebrand v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. GaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Simmons v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Johnston v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Victoria Hospital Assoc. v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API