Legal Opinion
In Re Rogers
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 2006No. 04-BG-1444PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has found that respondent Reginald J. Rogers intentionally, dishonestly and criminally misappropriated more than $260,000 from his client Hattie Mae Goode after her husband died. The Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence of record and are not contested; we accept them. Concluding, as do we, that respondent violated several Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 1.15(a) (misappropriation of entrusted funds and failure to keep complete records), 1.16(d) (failure on termination of representation to surrender property to which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re DortchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re BinghamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re OmwengaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re MitranoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re LebowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.